Web Notifications

SaltWire.com would like to send you notifications for breaking news alerts.

Activate notifications?

Jackie Vautour tells N.B. court his rights as Metis have been violated

None

STORY CONTINUES BELOW THESE SALTWIRE VIDEOS

Sidney Crosby & Drake Batherson NS Showdown #hockey #halifax #sports #penguins #ottawa

Watch on YouTube: "Sidney Crosby & Drake Batherson NS Showdown #hockey #halifax #sports #penguins #ottawa"

MONCTON, N.B. - Eleven years after he was charged with illegally digging clams in Kouchibouguac National Park, Jackie Vautour continues to argue that his constitutional rights as a Metis have been ignored by the justice system.
Vautour, 80, sat quietly in provincial court Tuesday as the Crown and defence delivered closing arguments in a trial that essentially questions the existence of Metis communities in Atlantic Canada.
Vautour claims he is Metis and as such is protected by the Constitution and should be allowed to follow the traditional practice of living off the land.
The Crown maintains there is no historic evidence of any Metis communities in Atlantic Canada and Vautour's argument is "woefully inadequate."
After listening to the arguments, Judge Pierre Arseneault said he would sort through the volumes of material submitted to the trial and render his decision on Feb. 12.
Vautour was charged with violating the National Parks Act by illegally digging clams out of season in September 1998 in Kouchibouguac. He was convicted but successfully appealed the case and in the recent trial has argued that his Metis heritage provides him with an aboriginal right to gather clams.
His son, Roy Vautour, 53, was also charged.
Earlier this year, Vautour failed to appear in court and a warrant was issued for his arrest. Vautour appeared Tuesday with his wife and other supporters but said his son was home sick with the flu.
Vautour, who has spent more than 40 years fighting for the rights of families expropriated from the Kouchibouguac area to make room for the national park, was reserved throughout the proceedings. At one point, he politely asked the judge to speak up because he was having trouble with his hearing aids.
In his closing arguments, defence lawyer Robert Rideout said the Metis culture can be traced back to the 1600s, when Samuel de Champlain brought French settlers to what is now New Brunswick and Nova Scotia.
Rideout said Champlain encouraged French settlers to marry and breed with the aboriginal people to create the Metis.
He said Vautour continues to live off the land and was arrested for doing something his forefathers had done for generations - "fishing for his survival" - and the arrest was an infringement of his rights under the Constitution.
Crown prosecutor Gerald Grant said Vautour's arguments do not hold water and should be dismissed.
He said the onus was on Vautour's lawyer to prove that he was part of a distinct society that had long historical and cultural ties to the area around Kouchibouguac, but his arguments turned out to be "woefully inadequate."
Grant cited various expert studies to show that Atlantic Canadians of mixed breeds either associated themselves with the Acadian or the Mi'kmaq peoples rather than a third group known as Metis.
He said Vautour only started to identify himself as a Metis around 1994. Before that he described himself as a proud Acadian.
As for living off the land by hunting, fishing and gathering, Grant said many ethnic groups and cultures in rural areas, including English, Irish and Scottish, did that for generations as well, the Crown lawyer said.

Share story:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT