Armstrong working to overcome EI myths

Darrell
Darrell Cole
Send to a friend

Send this article to a friend.

‘Very few people in the system are going to see any changes’

Cumberland Colchester Musquodoboit Valley MP Scott Armstrong (centre) speaks to Rotarians Frank Elliott (left) and Ian McCarthy after speaking to the Amherst Rotary Club on Monday. 

AMHERST – Changes to Canada’s employment insurance system is something Scott Armstrong hears a lot about from his constituents.

As he prepares to head back to Ottawa to for the next session of the House of Commons, the Cumberland Colchester Musquodoboit Valley MP said he’s trying to reach out to as many people as possible to expose some of the myths generated about the changes.

“The problem we face is the regulations just came into effect last Monday,” Armstrong said Monday after speaking to members of the Amherst Rotary Club. “The fact is to lose your EI claim will only happen if you choose not to go to work if work that suits you is there. The vast number of EI claimants, including seasonal workers, are not going to see any changes.”

Armstrong, who is hosting a public town hall-style meeting in Northport on Wednesday night, said the changes are designed to bring accountability and integrity to the system.

Government he said is often criticized for subsidizing people who don’t want to work, and while there are thousands of unemployed Canadians many businesses find they have no other choice but to bring in foreign workers.

He wants to ensure that every job available is first offered to Canadians before temporary foreign workers are brought in.

“Canada is really doing better than many other countries in the G-7 or G-8. We have 93 per cent of our workforce working, but we still need to do a better job,” Armstrong said. “We need to make sure we are as productive as possible.”

Armstrong said changes to EI are not intended to be punitive and claimants will not be forced to take jobs that pay less than their claim or ensure personal or financial hardship.

“In some circumstances EI has become a disincentive to work,” Armstrong said. “Ideally it’s better for people to be working, but you won’t be forced to take a job where you’ll make less money than your current EI claim or take a job where things like child-care and transportation costs will make you worse off than you would be on EI. The only time you’ll be forced to take a job is if you’ll be better off in the long run.”

Armstrong said personal circumstances will be considered, however, he said claimants will be asked to accountable by documenting how they make themselves available.

“In reality, very few people in the system are going to see any changes,” Armstrong said.

dcole@amherstdaily.com

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page

Comments

Comments

Recent comments

  • Theop Magaz
    January 22, 2013 - 08:24

    Just another example of a Harper-led Western Protest Party idea that neither cares or considers the reality of the economies of Atlantic Canada. I feel sorry for Mr. Armstrong who has to defend these onerous policies to his friends when the fact is he will never, ever rise to decision maker status while the Alberta bloc is running that once great party.

  • Jason
    January 22, 2013 - 04:03

    myths? just ask the young mother in PEI..... just repeat the glorious leader's message Armstrong and all will be well, don't want ot end up like Casey

  • Lisa
    January 21, 2013 - 18:06

    "Government he said is often criticized for subsidizing people who don’t want to work..." Pretty sure most of the criticism I hear is more about people living on Welfare and less people who WORK to pay into EI then reap the benefits when layed off whether seasonally or because of the end of their jobs.

  • bill
    January 21, 2013 - 17:45

    mr armstrong you and the rest of the partys have been inching foreigan workers for years now there is jobs in amherst and other areas that they just brought workers i have a young boy grauted from high school that can not get a job but you will hire foreigan workers in these areas you talking to people promiseing them the world guess concertives and ndp have run out of luck but have fun trying to get reelected

  • bill
    January 21, 2013 - 17:45

    mr armstrong you and the rest of the partys have been inching foreigan workers for years now there is jobs in amherst and other areas that they just brought workers i have a young boy grauted from high school that can not get a job but you will hire foreigan workers in these areas you talking to people promiseing them the world guess concertives and ndp have run out of luck but have fun trying to get reelected

  • Discouraged
    January 21, 2013 - 16:38

    Although I applaud SOME of the changes to our EI system - its way past time that something similar or ever better be applied to the Welfare System, this is where things have gone terribly wrong and I feel some of these new EI changes will force some people to feel that Welfare is their only answer

  • Shane
    January 21, 2013 - 16:28

    I think that if most of the businesses paid more then minimum wage they would find an abundance of people looking to work for their company, and in the long run have valuable employees stick around.