AMHERST - Appeals of property assessments in Cumberland County are down considerably from this time last year.
Property appeals on the decline
- Rate
- Top of the page
Comments
-
- Steve
- - February 25, 2010 at 00:45:56
Constituent from ns: You are right on the Money with that prediction. I hate to be skeptical but this appears to be exactly what is happening.
IMHO as always. -
- Constituent
- - February 25, 2010 at 00:45:48
Youre right fuzzy, and they wont get tired thats for sure, its their job. I imagine some of the appraisers look forward to a challenge going for the win, if not this years, Ill get you next year. Im sure its a game to some
-
- Fuzzy Bear
- - February 25, 2010 at 00:45:42
The appeals process is a joke. I went through it a number of years ago and while I did prevail that time the very next year up it went again. These property assessors have nothing else to do all day but play these numbers games. Their objective is to tire you out repeating this appeal process over and over until finally you surrender. I could see that happening so I just retreated into my cave and stayed there. Obviously so have many others. It's easier to sleep than fight.
Face it people Bureaucracy is invincible!! -
- Constituent
- - February 25, 2010 at 00:45:35
I believe the tax payers are being tricked into thinking their assessments are capped to help ease out tax burden. My tax assessment went up by 10% but capped so my actual bill didnt change much. As soon as they feel comfortable that the people are used to their assessments, the cap will be removed. Then youll see some appeals. I think its dirty and undermined way to handle things.
-
- OutofTowner
- - February 25, 2010 at 00:45:32
Constituent is right, my property isn't capped because we live out of NS. Our property assessment has gone up 56% in six years. I thought the assessment was based on the *value* of the property? As far as an appeal, the foxes are guarding the hen house.
-
- Sherman
- - February 25, 2010 at 00:45:32
I believe there is an arithmetic error in this article. You note that Parrsboro had an increase of 1% with 34 total appeals launched. If there were 33 appeals last year and there were a minimum increase of 1 appeal in 2010 to 34, that is almost exactly a 3% change. It would take an increase of 1/3 of an appeal to be the 1% noted which I assume in filing appeals is not possible.


